The AI Bubble
How Nvidia and Tech Earnings Are Propping Up the Entire U.S. Stock Market
The U.S. stock market’s recent exuberance masks a troubling reality: the gains are increasingly concentrated in a handful of tech giants, with artificial intelligence (AI) hype—and Nvidia’s staggering earnings—serving as the primary fuel. But , as Edward Zitron on wheresyoured.at recently argued, this dynamic is unsustainable, raising parallels to past market bubbles where narrow leadership preceded painful corrections.
The AI-Fuelled Tech Rally
The S&P 500’s 15% year-to-date rise has been driven overwhelmingly by the "Magnificent Seven" (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, and Nvidia), with Nvidia alone contributing nearly a third of the index’s gains. The chipmaker’s stock has surged over 150% in 2024 alone, propelled by insatiable demand for its AI-optimized GPUs.
This frenzy reflects a broader market narrative: AI will deliver transformative productivity gains, justifying sky-high valuations. But as Zitron notes, much of this optimism rests on speculative future earnings rather than tangible economic benefits.
Why Nvidia’s Dominance Is a Warning Sign
Nvidia’s explosive growth—revenue more than doubled year-over-year in its latest quarter (Q2 2025)—has made it the poster child of the AI boom. But there are red flags:
- Supply Chain Dependence: Nvidia’s success hinges on TSMC’s ability to manufacture advanced chips, leaving it vulnerable to geopolitical risks (e.g., China-Taiwan tensions).
- Customer Concentration: A small number of hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Meta) account for nearly 40% of Nvidia’s data center revenue. Any pullback in their AI spending would crater earnings.
- Valuation Stretch: Nvidia trades at 35x forward sales—a multiple reminiscent of the dot-com bubble’s peak.
The Broader Market’s Dangerous Reliance on Tech
Hedge funds have piled into AI stocks at record levels, turning this into one of the most crowded trades in history. Nvidia, Microsoft, and Meta now dominate hedge fund portfolios, with many funds running leveraged long positions.
The S&P 500’s performance is now more concentrated than at any time since the 1970s, with tech making up over 30% of the index. This creates two major risks:
If AI adoption slows or fails to meet lofty expectations and tech earnings disappoint it could trigger a market-wide correction.
The second is danger is passive investing distortions: As Zitron highlights, index funds mechanically pour money into top-weighted stocks (like Nvidia), inflating valuations further and creating a feedback loop detached from fundamentals.
Historical Echoes: Dot-Com and FAANG Mania
The current AI craze mirrors past episodes of irrational exuberance like the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s and the 2022 FAANG (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Google) Crash.
In the late 90s, Cisco and Intel were the "Nvidias" of their era, with investors convinced internet infrastructure spending would grow indefinitely. When demand slowed, their stocks collapsed—dragging the broader market down with them.
Similarly, in 2022 Meta and Netflix’s 50%+ plunges showed how quickly sentiment can reverse when growth stories falter. If earnings disappoint, the stampede for exits could trigger a violent sell-off akin to 2022—but on a much larger scale.
The $620 Trillion Derivatives House of Cards
The real systemic risk lies in the financial derivatives market—a sprawling, interconnected web of options, swaps, and futures contracts that dwarfs global GDP. A sharp correction in tech stocks could trigger a chain reaction:
Options Market Collapse: Millions of call options on Nvidia and other AI stocks would implode, forcing market makers to rapidly hedge by dumping shares.
Counterparty Contagion: Banks and shadow lenders (like Citadel Securities) would face margin calls on derivatives tied to tech valuations, potentially freezing credit markets.
Volatility Explosion: The VIX, already suppressed by passive investing, could spike to 2008 levels, triggering algorithmic sell programs.
This scenario isn’t theoretical. In 2018, the S&P 500 plunged 10% in days due to volatility-linked derivative unwinds. Today, with derivatives notional values at USD620 trillion (BIS 2022 estimate - the real figure is likely over a quadrillion), the risks are even greater.
What Comes Next?
For now, the AI trade keeps working—but the longer the market depends on a single sector (and a single stock, Nvidia), the greater the risk of a violent unwind. Key triggers to watch:
- Slowing AI Investment: If Big Tech’s investment in AI infrastructure flattens, Nvidia’s growth narrative collapses.
- Regulatory Crackdowns: Antitrust actions or export controls on AI chips could disrupt the sector.
- Macro Shocks: Higher interest rates for a prolonged period could deflate speculative tech valuations.
Conclusion
The AI bubble isn’t just a tech story—it’s a systemic risk. With hedge funds overexposed, derivatives markets hyper-leveraged, and earnings expectations detached from reality, the stage is set for a crash that could dwarf 2022’s tech wreck. As Ed Zitron warns, warns, when the "most crowded trade in history" reverses, the collateral damage will be catastrophic. Investors betting on perpetual AI gains are ignoring the lesson of every past mania: no bubble deflates gently and markets built on "this time is different" narratives rarely end well.
Nvidia and AI may be driving today’s gains, but history suggests that excessive concentration always corrects—often painfully. Investors betting on indefinite tech dominance should remember: no sector stays king forever.
If you found this article valuable think about subscribing, follow me on Patreon or buy me coffee below. Please like and share. It’s free. Many thanks.
